Use the current tools
We connect around what already runs before replacing anything.
Logistics and operations
Build an owned planning layer that connects orders, stock, routes, drivers, capacity, ERP, WMS, or TMS data and gives planners explainable AI suggestions.
Industry pages work best when they stay close to the daily operation. We start with the messy workflow, not with a generic AI demo.
We connect around what already runs before replacing anything.
The workflow must know when to stop and hand over to a person.
First proof is practical: fewer interruptions, faster follow-up, cleaner data, or lower cost.
The best first step is often not a full transport management system, but a planning layer that connects what already exists.
Capacity changes faster than the planning sheet can keep up.
Dispatch decisions depend on local knowledge in a few people's heads.
Exception handling is hidden in phone calls and chat threads.
Management sees delays after they happen, not while they can still be prevented.
The best first step is often not a full transport management system, but a planning layer that connects what already exists.
| Planning SaaS vs owned planning layer | Rented SaaS | Owned workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs | Works best when data already fits the tool. | Connects orders, capacity, calendars, fleet data, and manual exceptions. |
| Decisions | Rules are often generic. | Rules reflect routes, customers, drivers, SLAs, and local constraints. |
| Exceptions | Handled outside the system. | Captured, prioritized, and visible before they break the day. |
| AI | Feature add-on. | Planning assistant trained around your constraints and approval rules. |
Give planners better visibility first, then automate suggestions once the data is trustworthy.
01
Bring orders, capacity, drivers, locations, timeslots, and constraints into one model.
02
Create a live exception queue for delays, missing capacity, urgent orders, and conflicts.
03
Let AI suggest route swaps, priority changes, and customer updates with reasons.
04
Compare planned vs actual performance and tune the rules weekly.
Step 1: Orders and capacity are imported each morning.
Step 2: System highlights conflicts, missing drivers, and risky routes.
Step 3: AI proposes changes with impact on SLA and cost.
Step 4: Planner approves, edits, or rejects suggestions.
Step 5: Customers or internal teams receive reviewed updates.
Relevant solutions
Use these proposition pages when you want to turn the industry example into a concrete buying path.
Practical guides
Read the implementation choices behind this workflow before you define scope.
Not first. Many teams start with an owned planning layer on top of existing systems.
It can suggest decisions. Automatic dispatch should only come after clear rules, logging, and approval confidence.
At minimum: orders, time windows, resources, locations, constraints, and actual outcomes.
Yes. The same layer can monitor incoming orders, missing information, capacity conflicts, delays, and customer updates, while planners approve consequential changes.
Measure planner hours, late changes, empty capacity, avoidable kilometres, SLA misses, and time spent updating customers before and after the pilot.